Quiz-summary
0 of 1 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
Information
Presented by Edward McCarthy, M.D. and prepared by Natasha Rekhtman, M.D., Ph.D.
Case 4: A 20-year-old man had a lump in his arm which was increasing in firmness.
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 1
1. Question
Week 229: Case 4
A 20-year-old man had a lump in his arm which was increasing in firmness over the past several months. A radiograph demonstrated a well defined radiodensity in the area of his biceps muscle.images/EMC 06 2005 case 4 1.jpg
images/EMC 06 2005 case 4 2.jpg
images/EMC 06 2005 case 4 3.jpg
images/EMC 06 2005 case 4 4.jpgCorrect
Answer: Heterotopic ossification
Histology: The radiograph shows a well defined radiodense mass. The trabecular pattern of the radiodensity indicates that the lesion is composed of bone. Histologically, there is osteoid deposition in a cellular fibrous tissue stroma. There is a distinct zonal pattern i.e. the bone is more dense at the periphery of the lesion. The central cellular area shows a distinct “tissue culture-like” appearance. Although the stroma is cellular, there is no evidence of pleomorphism or atypical mitotic figures.
Discussion: The lesion is not an osteogenic sarcoma because of the lack of atypia and abnormal mitotic figures. In addition, the zonal pattern is an indicative of a non-neoplastic, reactive disorder. Zonal patterns are not present in osteogenic sarcoma.
The lesion is not a chondrosarcoma. Although the radiograph may raise the possibility of a cartilage tumor, there is no cartilage in the lesion.
The lesion is not tumoral calcinosis because there is not evidence of a dystrophic calcification. In this case, the radiodensity is entirely due to bone formation.
Incorrect
Answer: Heterotopic ossification
Histology: The radiograph shows a well defined radiodense mass. The trabecular pattern of the radiodensity indicates that the lesion is composed of bone. Histologically, there is osteoid deposition in a cellular fibrous tissue stroma. There is a distinct zonal pattern i.e. the bone is more dense at the periphery of the lesion. The central cellular area shows a distinct “tissue culture-like” appearance. Although the stroma is cellular, there is no evidence of pleomorphism or atypical mitotic figures.
Discussion: The lesion is not an osteogenic sarcoma because of the lack of atypia and abnormal mitotic figures. In addition, the zonal pattern is an indicative of a non-neoplastic, reactive disorder. Zonal patterns are not present in osteogenic sarcoma.
The lesion is not a chondrosarcoma. Although the radiograph may raise the possibility of a cartilage tumor, there is no cartilage in the lesion.
The lesion is not tumoral calcinosis because there is not evidence of a dystrophic calcification. In this case, the radiodensity is entirely due to bone formation.